Our experts will accompany you through these challenges. These include new rules for the licensing of online gaming:. Live betting Loss, betting, pay-out limits Responsible rules of the game Security, social and economic concepts Connection to the servers and services of the new authorities.

Our focus is on the design and implementation of IT-supported business models and processes, the creation of modern applications to optimise our customers' core business as well as the support of IT operations.

This range of services is divided into a number of elements that offer our customers individual process entry points depending on the requirements of a project:.

Thanks to our extensive industry experience, we see ourselves not only as an implementation service provider, but also offer you consulting services.

Together with you we develop business models and strategies and also work out resilient business plans.

In the present case, the referring court does not raise any questions concerning the justification of the restriction at issue on the freedom to provide services.

The referring court therefore wishes to know whether the proportionality and consistency of the restrictive legislation at issue in the main proceedings, seen as a whole, is called into question given the existence, for a limited period, of more liberal legislation only in the Land Schleswig-Holstein.

Conversely, the Westdeutsche Lotterie, the German, Belgian and Portuguese Governments and the Commission take the view that the first question should be answered in the negative and that, in the circumstances of the case in the main proceedings, the GlüStV does not constitute a disproportionate restriction on the freedom to provide services.

Furthermore, the facts of the present case can be distinguished from those in the case which gave rise to the judgment in Carmen Media Group EU:C since, in the case in the main proceedings, the issue is not the relationship and possible duty of vertical coordination between the authorities of the Land concerned and the Federal authorities, but the horizontal relationship between the Länder having their own legislative powers within a Member State having a federal structure.

Finally, even assuming that the existence of legislation of one Land , which is more liberal than that in force in the other Länder , might damage the consistency of the legislation at issue as a whole, it must be observed that, in the circumstances of the case in the main proceedings, such damage to consistency was limited ratione temporis and ratione loci to a single Land.

Therefore, it cannot be argued that the derogating legal situation in one Land seriously affects the appropriateness of the restrictions on games of chance applicable in all the other Länder to achieve the legitimate public interest objectives that they pursue.

After that date, that Land applied the more restrictive rules of the GlüStV already in force in the other Länder. It follows that the restriction on the freedom to provide services constituted by the legislation on games of chance at issue in the main proceedings is capable of satisfying the requirements of proportionality as laid down in the case-law of the Court.

Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court.

Costs incurred in submitting observations to the Court, other than the costs of those parties, are not recoverable. Skip to main content.

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. EU case-law Case-law Digital reports Directory of case-law.

Quick search. Search tips. Need more search options? Use the Advanced search. In May , the UK Gambling Commission set out regulations that make online gambling safer and fairer.

The latest rules prescribe that operators must verify customer age before any customer can deposit funds into an account or gamble with the licensee using their own money or a free bet bonus.

These new developments intend to help operators prevent and detect criminal activity, the underaged, and the vulnerable from gambling.

Sanctions for non-compliance can be brought forward by the Commission or the police for operating without a license.

Key will be implementing a solution that provides operators a seamless and secure process that identifies and protects its players and meets compliance requirements.

IDnow has the experience and products that serve our clients to meet compliance requirements. A solid and secure age verification process makes the gaming industry a safer place for everyone.

With IDnow AutoIdent this step is easy, uncomplicated and fully online. Your customers register themselves on the website or app and then directly go to the fully automated identification process.

Within minutes a customer is verified and able to start using your products and offers. Contact us. Dezember Inkrafttreten am: 1.

VG München, Beschluss vom Juni — M 17 S Abgerufen am April April deutsch. BVerfG, Beschluss vom März , Az.

Deutscher Lottoverband, 4. Februar , abgerufen am 3. Mai September , Az. April ]. September In: Heise online.

Heise Zeitschriften Verlag , Juni , abgerufen am 3. August In: innen. Abgerufen am 2. Juli Nicht mehr online verfügbar. Archiviert vom Original am 3.

November ; abgerufen am Info: Der Archivlink wurde automatisch eingesetzt und noch nicht geprüft.

In: vg-wiesbaden-justiz. Juni In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Juni ]. In: vgh-kassel-justiz.

Februar , Az. März wr-recht. In: News — Bet Soccer Net. März bet-soccer. März ].

The questions referred Halma Spielregeln a preliminary ruling. Hecker, M. The core of our software development is the realisation of customised solutions that cannot Xcasino fulfilled by standard software. Februarabgerufen am 3. Januar ]. Ruttig and M. GlüStv Of new regulations, challenges and opportunities. Whoever offers intuitive, quick and easy solutions wins the customers. GlüÄndStV bis zu einer Neuverhandlung auszusetzen. Sharpston, Registrar: A. Alastair Mackichan. In this case, when applying for a licence, an authorised person must be named for official correspondence within Germany and sufficient documentation and proof of registration must be presented by foreign authorities that are comparable to the German official documentation. This depends on the outcome of the current negotiations between Elchgulasch federal states regarding a further amendment to the GlüStV, which is to deal in particular with the regulation of Charlie Charlie Spiel casino games. The dispute with the operator – which is based in the EU but outside of Germany and took online bets on horse racing from German customers – dates back to , when the State Treaty on Gambling (GlüStV) came into effect and allowed sports betting licenses to be issued. In , the Glücksspielstaatsvertrag (GlüStV), or Interstate Gambling Treaty, was passed. It didn’t last long, as the European Supreme Court found it went against EU rules for fair competition. This re-opened the field. The first revision to the treaty (GlüÄndStV) came in and was passed in Glücksspielstaatsvertrag (GlüStV) In Germany, the main legal framework governing online gambling is the Interstate Treaty for Gambling (Glücksspielstaatsvertrag, GlüStV). Share on Facebook Share on Twitter. Under the third amendment to the German State Treaty on Gaming (GlüStV), private operators can now apply for a license to offer services within the country. Prior to the change, online gaming was. The third amendment to the German State Treaty on Gaming (GlüStV) will come into force on 1 January Private operators of online sports betting platforms will now be given the opportunity to apply for a licence for the operating of online sports betting in Germany. Unlike in the past, the number of licence holders is no longer limited.